Scared, readers buy Orwell to explain ‘post-fact’ Trump

Italian, Spanish and British covers for George Orwell's classic novel 1984.

Italian, Spanish and British covers for George Orwell’s classic novel 1984.

Scared and mystified by President Donald Trump, people on both sides of the Atlantic are turning to George Orwell’s 1984 and other dystopian novels for insight into what to expect from a repressive, fact-denying government.

A surge in sales of Brave New World, 1984, and other books with pessimistic visions of the future comes as people struggle to understand the troublesome political realities of the new Trump administration, including the damage it threatens to the fight against AIDS, to the battle for recognition of  the human rights of LGBTI people, and to so much else.

Sales of the novel 1984 rose after Trump communications adviser Kellyanne Conway on Jan. 22 discussed the size of the crowd on Inauguration Day, describing a Trump spokesman’s incorrect statements as “alternative facts.”

Cover of the bestselling Signet Classics edition of George Orwell's 1984.

Cover of the bestselling Signet Classics edition of George Orwell’s 1984.

In the Orwell novel, published in 1949, the government crushes independent thought, using language it calls “newspeak” to eliminate unacceptable ideas.

A Signet Classics edition of the book 1984 reached No. 1 on the Amazon bestseller list, while a Brawtley Press edition was at No. 4.

On similar bestseller lists for Amazon’s European sites, Orwell’s 1984 reached:

  • Number 3 on the British list
  • Number 3 on the French list
  • Number 12 on the Spanish list
  • Number 15 on the Italian list

On the U.S. bestseller list, it was joined by other dystopian fiction:

  • Sinclair Lewis’s 1935 novel It Can’t Happen Here (at Number 8), about the rise of an American demagogue, and
  • Aldous Huxley’s 1931 novel Brave New World (at Number 10), about civilization destroyed by ignorance and what Huxley called “man’s almost infinite appetite for distractions.”
In September 2015, described the similarities between then-candidate Donald Trump and Siinclair Lewis's fictional account of an American demagogue's rise to power. (Photo courtesy of

In September 2015, described the similarities between then-candidate Donald Trump and Sinclair Lewis’s fictional account of an American demagogue’s rise to power. (Photo courtesy of

Back in September 2015, the online magazine focused on the similarities between then-candidate Trump and the charismatic, popularly elected dictator of Lewis’s cautionary 1935 novel, who “appealed directly to his core constituency of unprosperous and resentful white men to help him repress dissent and bring fascism to America.” stated:

“With his careful mix of plainspoken honesty and reactionary delusion, Trump is following an old rhetorical playbook, one defined and employed successfully in the [fictitious] 1936 presidential campaign of Senator Berzelius “Buzz” Windrip. … Windrip laid out the classic nativist call to action that Trump would pick up nearly word-for-word.”

The Guardian cites similarities between Trump and the novel 1984:
The book’s chilling account of a couple’s struggle against a dystopian society has many elements that will strike a contemporary reader as disturbingly prescient. Orwell’s description of “doublespeak” – the ability, and requirement, to utterly believe two contradictory thoughts at the same time – feels tailor-made for a president who simultaneously believes that three to five million “illegals” voted in the election, and that his victory in that election was completely fair and valid.

Similarly, [in Orwell’s narrative] the Party’s slogan that “Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past” seems to chime with the White House’s incorrect claim that Trump won the general election with “the most [electoral votes] since any Republican since Reagan” (he didn’t) or that the crowd on 20 January was the “largest audience to ever witness an inauguration” (it wasn’t).

But Guardian reporter Alex Hern recommends other dystopian novels as more relevant, including:
  • Cover of Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale.

    Cover of Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale.

    The Handmaid’s Tale (Number 26 on the Amazon bestseller list): “Margaret Atwood’s 1985 novel is set in a near-future New England following the collapse of America into the authoritarian, theocratic state of Gilead. It was groundbreaking for its treatment of gender, depicting a state in which the advances of feminism have been comprehensively destroyed. Women are considered inferior to men, and their every behaviour is tightly controlled by the state. In particular, their role in reproduction is bound to a strict caste system: abortion is illegal, and fertile women are required to bear children for higher-status women. [Meanwhile, in reality] On Monday, Trump signed the ‘global gag order’, barring US funding from going to NGOs who provide abortion services or information. It was one of his very first acts as president.”  [That gag order threatens funding for many countries’ health programs serving women and LGBTI people.]

  • Brave New World:  “Compared to Nineteen Eighty-Four, Brave New World makes the case that an oppressive, authoritarian dystopia can still be pleasant to live in for the vast majority, sparking little mass resistance.”
  • Virtual Light by William Gibson (1993): “[In the book] Ever greater concentration of wealth has rendered multinational corporations miniature states in their own right, with private security forces acting like personal armies for the super-rich, while the middle class has almost entirely dissipated. [Meanwhile, in reality] Trump’s net worth is currently estimated to be about $3.7bn, and he has refused to extricate himself from his businesses in any way that satisfies conventional ethical norms.”
Related articles:


2 thoughts on “Scared, readers buy Orwell to explain ‘post-fact’ Trump

  1. Those hamming-it-up readers should read the Koran instead. Much scarier. I’m a gay man who thinks Trump is awesome. We haven’t had one single Muslim mass murder in the U.S. since he’s been elected (homophobic murder or generalized). Unlike in Europe (sadly). And certainly unlike under Obama. Trump definitely has the Muslim population on notice, and in the long run admitting what a threat Islam is might be the only thing that saves gay civilization.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s